lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230329125127.emzzajbobmvuo5ml@choosing>
Date:   Wed, 29 Mar 2023 07:51:27 -0500
From:   Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
To:     Hari Nagalla <hnagalla@...com>
CC:     <vigneshr@...com>, <kristo@...nel.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j784s4-mcu: Add MCU domain R5F
 cluster node

On 04:36-20230329, Hari Nagalla wrote:
> The J784S4 SoCs have 4 dual-core Arm Cortex-R5F processor (R5FSS)
> subsystems/clusters. One R5F cluster (MCU_R5FSS0) is present within
> the MCU domain (MCU_R5FSS0), and the remaining three clusters are
> present in the MAIN domain (MAIN_R5FSS0, MAIN_R5FSS1 & MAIN_R5FSS2).
> The functionality of the R5FSS is same as the R5FSS functionality on
> earlier K3 platform devices J721S2. Each of the R5FSS can be configured
> at boot time to be either run in a LockStep mode or in an Asymmetric
> Multi Processing (AMP) fashion in Split-mode.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hari Nagalla <hnagalla@...com>
> ---
>  .../boot/dts/ti/k3-j784s4-mcu-wakeup.dtsi     | 42 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 42 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j784s4-mcu-wakeup.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j784s4-mcu-wakeup.dtsi
> index 64bd3dee14aa..e290e0925bc9 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j784s4-mcu-wakeup.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j784s4-mcu-wakeup.dtsi
> @@ -309,4 +309,46 @@
>  			ti,cpts-periodic-outputs = <2>;
>  		};
>  	};
> +
> +	mcu_r5fss0: r5fss@...00000 {
> +		compatible = "ti,j721s2-r5fss";
> +		ti,cluster-mode = <1>;
> +		#address-cells = <1>;
> +		#size-cells = <1>;
> +		ranges = <0x41000000 0x00 0x41000000 0x20000>,
> +			 <0x41400000 0x00 0x41400000 0x20000>;
> +		power-domains = <&k3_pds 345 TI_SCI_PD_EXCLUSIVE>;
> +
> +		mcu_r5fss0_core0: r5f@...00000 {
> +			compatible = "ti,j721s2-r5f";
> +			reg = <0x41000000 0x00010000>,
> +			      <0x41010000 0x00010000>;
> +			reg-names = "atcm", "btcm";
> +			ti,sci = <&sms>;
> +			ti,sci-dev-id = <346>;
> +			ti,sci-proc-ids = <0x01 0xff>;
> +			resets = <&k3_reset 346 1>;
> +			firmware-name = "j784s4-mcu-r5f0_0-fw";
> +			ti,atcm-enable = <1>;
> +			ti,btcm-enable = <1>;
> +			ti,loczrama = <1>;
> +			status = "disabled";

Why are these disabled by default?

> +		};
> +
> +		mcu_r5fss0_core1: r5f@...00000 {
> +			compatible = "ti,j721s2-r5f";
> +			reg = <0x41400000 0x00010000>,
> +			      <0x41410000 0x00010000>;
> +			reg-names = "atcm", "btcm";
> +			ti,sci = <&sms>;
> +			ti,sci-dev-id = <347>;
> +			ti,sci-proc-ids = <0x02 0xff>;
> +			resets = <&k3_reset 347 1>;
> +			firmware-name = "j784s4-mcu-r5f0_1-fw";
> +			ti,atcm-enable = <1>;
> +			ti,btcm-enable = <1>;
> +			ti,loczrama = <1>;
> +			status = "disabled";
> +		};
> +	};
>  };
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3  1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ