[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cad25e0a-9594-3d5e-79e7-fd00a80f67ac@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 18:40:39 +0200
From: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...nel.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, guoren <guoren@...nel.org>,
Brian Cain <bcain@...cinc.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nel.org>,
Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
"Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>,
"Conor.Dooley" <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
"linux-oxnas@...ups.io" <linux-oxnas@...ups.io>,
"linux-csky@...r.kernel.org" <linux-csky@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-hexagon@...r.kernel.org, linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-openrisc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-openrisc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org,
Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/21] ARM: drop SMP support for ARM11MPCore
Le 30/03/2023 à 12:03, Arnd Bergmann a écrit :
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2023, at 09:48, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>> On 27/03/2023 14:13, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>>>
>>> The cache management operations for noncoherent DMA on ARMv6 work
>>> in two different ways:
>>>
>>> * When CONFIG_DMA_CACHE_RWFO is set, speculative prefetches on in-flight
>>> DMA buffers lead to data corruption when the prefetched data is written
>>> back on top of data from the device.
>>>
>>> * When CONFIG_DMA_CACHE_RWFO is disabled, a cache flush on one CPU
>>> is not seen by the other core(s), leading to inconsistent contents
>>> accross the system.
>>>
>>> As a consequence, neither configuration is actually safe to use in a
>>> general-purpose kernel that is used on both MPCore systems and ARM1176
>>> with prefetching enabled.
>>>
>>> We could add further workarounds to make the behavior more dynamic based
>>> on the system, but realistically, there are close to zero remaining
>>> users on any ARM11MPCore anyway, and nobody seems too interested in it,
>>> compared to the more popular ARM1176 used in BMC2835 and AST2500.
>>>
>>> The Oxnas platform has some minimal support in OpenWRT, but most of the
>>> drivers and dts files never made it into the mainline kernel, while the
>>> Arm Versatile/Realview platform mainly serves as a reference system but
>>> is not necessary to be kept working once all other ARM11MPCore are gone.
>>
>> Acked-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>
>>
>> It's sad but it's the reality, there's no chance full OXNAS support will
>> ever come upstream and no real work has been done for years.
>>
>> I think OXNAS support can be programmed for removal for next release,
>> it would need significant work to rework current support to make it acceptable
>> before trying to upstream missing bits anyway.
>
> Ok, thanks for your reply!
>
> To clarify, do you think we should plan for removal after the next
> stable release (6.3, removed in 6.4), or after the next LTS
> release (probably 6.6, removed in 6.7)? As far as I understand,
> the next OpenWRT release (23.x) will be based on linux-5.15,
> and the one after that (24.x) would likely still use 6.1, unless
> they skip an LTS kernel.
I think it's ok to remove it ASAP, or at least before the next LTS,
not having SMP makes the platform barely usable so the earliest is the best.
Neil
>
> Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists