[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230330171851.GE548901@google.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 18:18:51 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: "Lin, Meng-Bo" <linmengbo0689@...tonmail.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Nikita Travkin <nikita@...n.ru>,
Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net>,
linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: leds: aw2013: Document vdd-supply
On Thu, 30 Mar 2023, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 30/03/2023 13:46, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, 20 Mar 2023, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >
> >> On 20/03/2023 15:22, Lin, Meng-Bo wrote:
> >>> Document vdd-supply, a regulator providing power to the "VDD" pin.
> >>>
> >>
> >> No. This device does not have VDD pin. I checked in datasheet.
> >
> > I'm confused. This patch set much do something?
> >
> > I guess a better commit message would help. Let me request that.
>
> There was a v2 - with a discussion - so we wait for v3 which clearly
> indicates this is supply on controller side. IMHO, this is still wrong
> because it is controller's property, not device's, but Rob gave here
> green light, so v3 with proper explanation would be fine.
Understood, thanks.
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists