[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5eb0b699-47bb-ebb7-2ea5-0cf05ccf29ab@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 15:44:24 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
Cc: "Lin, Meng-Bo" <linmengbo0689@...tonmail.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Nikita Travkin <nikita@...n.ru>,
Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net>,
linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: leds: aw2013: Document vdd-supply
On 30/03/2023 13:46, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Mar 2023, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>
>> On 20/03/2023 15:22, Lin, Meng-Bo wrote:
>>> Document vdd-supply, a regulator providing power to the "VDD" pin.
>>>
>>
>> No. This device does not have VDD pin. I checked in datasheet.
>
> I'm confused. This patch set much do something?
>
> I guess a better commit message would help. Let me request that.
There was a v2 - with a discussion - so we wait for v3 which clearly
indicates this is supply on controller side. IMHO, this is still wrong
because it is controller's property, not device's, but Rob gave here
green light, so v3 with proper explanation would be fine.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists