[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <864ef90a-c235-1e72-7941-6766541bb199@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 15:32:29 +0100
From: Steven Price <steven.price@....com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>, John Keeping <john@...anate.com>
Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iommu/rockchip: Add missing set_platform_dma_ops
callback
On 27/03/2023 16:26, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 03:35:04PM +0100, John Keeping wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 11:11:27AM +0000, Steven Price wrote:
>>> Similar to exynos, we need a set_platform_dma_ops() callback for proper
>>> operation on ARM 32 bit after recent changes in the IOMMU framework
>>> (detach ops removal). But also the use of a NULL domain is confusing.
>>>
>>> Rework the code to have a singleton rk_identity_domain which is assigned
>>> to domain when using an identity mapping rather than "detaching". This
>>> makes the code easier to reason about.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@....com>
>>> ---
>>> Changes since v1[1]:
>>>
>>> * Reworked the code to avoid a NULL domain, instead a singleton
>>> rk_identity_domain is used instead. The 'detach' language is no
>>> longer used.
>>>
>>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230315164152.333251-1-steven.price%40arm.com
>>>
>>> drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>>> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c
>>> index f30db22ea5d7..437541004994 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c
>> [snip]
>>> +static struct iommu_domain rk_identity_domain = {
>>> + .type = IOMMU_DOMAIN_IDENTITY,
>>> + .ops = &rk_identity_ops,
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM
>>
>> Is this #ifdef needed? I can't see anything ARM-specific about this
>> function or .set_platform_dma_ops.
>
> set_platform_dma_ops is never called on ARM64.
I have to admit this was somewhat cargo-culted from the exynos-iommu
change. This is only needed for Arm, but I'm not sure if there's any
real harm including it for other arches.
>> Not shown in the patch are the pm_runtime hooks. Do they need to
>> change like this?
>
> Most likely yes
Good spot - I'll send a v3 with this fixed.
Thanks,
Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists