[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b985e536-227d-df86-0f23-b58882e9654b@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 16:34:41 +0200
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Cc: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
andersson@...nel.org, agross@...nel.org,
marijn.suijten@...ainline.org, Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>,
Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>,
Akhil P Oommen <quic_akhilpo@...cinc.com>,
"Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/msm/adreno: adreno_gpu: Use suspend() instead of
idle() on load error
On 29.03.2023 21:45, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Mar 2023 at 18:48, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 29.03.2023 16:37, Johan Hovold wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 04:04:44PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>>> If we fail to initialize the GPU for whatever reason (say we don't
>>>> embed the GPU firmware files in the initrd), the error path involves
>>>> pm_runtime_put_sync() which then calls idle() instead of suspend().
>>>>
>>>> This is suboptimal, as it means that we're not going through the
>>>> clean shutdown sequence. With at least A619_holi, this makes the GPU
>>>> not wake up until it goes through at least one more start-fail-stop
>>>> cycle. Fix that by using pm_runtime_put_sync_suspend to force a clean
>>>> shutdown.
>>>
>>> This does not sound right. If pm_runtime_put_sync() fails to suspend the
>>> device when the usage count drops to zero, then you have a bug somewhere
>>> else.
>> I was surprised to see that it was not called as well, but I wasn't able
>> to track it down before..
>
> Could you please check that it's autosuspend who kicks in? In other
> words, if we disable autosuspend, the pm_runtime_put_sync is enough()?
>
> That would probably mean that we lack some kind of reset in the hw_init path.
>
> On the other hand, I do not know how the device will react to the
> error-in-the-middle state. Modems for example, can enter the state
> where you can not properly turn it off once it starts the boot
> process.
>
> And if we remember the efforts that Akhil has put into making sure
> that the GPU is properly reset in case of an _error_, it might be
> nearly impossible to shut it down in a proper way.
>
> Thus said, I think that unless there is an obvious way to restart the
> init process, Korad's pm_runtime_put_sync_suspend() looks like a
> correct fix to me.
On the GPU side, when you cut GX and CX GDSCs, the hardware is off.
Some clock / gdsc logic may be retained, but the GPU itself gets
cut off. Parking the clocks and shuttting down VDD_GX (if exists)
only makes that stronger.
>
>>> Also since commit 2c087a336676 ("drm/msm/adreno: Load the firmware
>>> before bringing up the hardware") the firmware is loaded before even
>>> hitting these paths so the above description does not sound right in
>>> that respect either (or is missing some details).
>> ..but I did some more digging and I found that the precise "firmware"
>> that fails is the ZAP blob, which is not checked like SQE in the
>> commit you mentioned!
>>
>> Now I don't think that we can easily check for it as-is since
>> zap_shader_load_mdt() does the entire find-load-authenticate
>> dance which is required with secure assets, but it's obviously
>> possible to rip out the find-load part of that and go on from
>> there.
>
> Yes, I think we should load all firmware early. ZAP shader is a bit
> unique since the DT can override the name, but it might be nice to
> check for its presence earlier.
>
> At the same time it probably should not stop us from fixing the idle()
> vs suspend() bug.
I'm open to both solutions, as long as it can unblock me from
resubmitting the (hopefully) final version of GMU wrapper!
Konrad
>
>>
>> Do you think that would be a better solution?
>>
>> Konrad
>>
>>>
>>>> Test cases:
>>>> 1. firmware baked into kernel
>>>> 2. error loading fw in initrd -> load from rootfs at DE start
>>>>
>>>> Both succeed on A619_holi (SM6375) and A630 (SDM845).
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 0d997f95b70f ("drm/msm/adreno: fix runtime PM imbalance at gpu load")
>>>> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c | 2 +-
>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c
>>>> index f61896629be6..59f3302e8167 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c
>>>> @@ -477,7 +477,7 @@ struct msm_gpu *adreno_load_gpu(struct drm_device *dev)
>>>> return gpu;
>>>>
>>>> err_put_rpm:
>>>> - pm_runtime_put_sync(&pdev->dev);
>>>> + pm_runtime_put_sync_suspend(&pdev->dev);
>>>> err_disable_rpm:
>>>> pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
>>>
>>> Johan
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists