linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH tty-next 1/2] dt-bindings: serial: ni,ni16650: add bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 31 Mar 2023 12:59:38 -0500
From:   Brenda Streiff <brenda.streiff@...com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc:     Gratian Crisan <gratian.crisan@...com>,
        Jason Smith <jason.smith@...com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
        linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH tty-next 1/2] dt-bindings: serial: ni,ni16650: add
 bindings



On 3/30/23 02:28, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote
>> +      - enum:
>> +          - ni,ni16550
> 
> As Rob pointed out - you did not test it at all.
> 

I did, with dt-schema 2023.1 and the 'make dt_binding_check' command as
described in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-schema.rst
(with no DT_CHECKER_FLAGS, because I was unaware of it until Rob's post)

Is this a documentation gap, or is the DT_CHECKER_FLAGS option slated to
become the default for 'make dt_binding_check' in the future?