[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6807bede-7e95-d53a-5fed-0e7513b91d50@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2023 15:51:51 +0100
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com>
To: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Cc: intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Chris Wilson <chris.p.wilson@...ux.intel.com>,
Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...ux.intel.com>,
Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/i915/gt: Hold a wakeref for the active VM
On 31/03/2023 15:16, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> From: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
>
> There may be a disconnect between the GT used by the engine and the GT
> used for the VM, requiring us to hold a wakeref on both while the GPU is
> active with this request.
>
> v2: added explanation to __queue_and_release_pm
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
> [ahajda: removed not-yet-upstremed wakeref tracking bits]
> Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230330-hold_wakeref_for_active_vm-v1-1-baca712692f6@intel.com
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.h | 15 +++++++++++----
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pm.c | 9 +++++++++
> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.h
> index 0a8d553da3f439..48f888c3da083b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.h
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> #include "i915_drv.h"
> #include "intel_context_types.h"
> #include "intel_engine_types.h"
> +#include "intel_gt_pm.h"
> #include "intel_ring_types.h"
> #include "intel_timeline_types.h"
> #include "i915_trace.h"
> @@ -207,8 +208,11 @@ void intel_context_exit_engine(struct intel_context *ce);
> static inline void intel_context_enter(struct intel_context *ce)
> {
> lockdep_assert_held(&ce->timeline->mutex);
> - if (!ce->active_count++)
> - ce->ops->enter(ce);
> + if (ce->active_count++)
> + return;
> +
> + ce->ops->enter(ce);
> + intel_gt_pm_get(ce->vm->gt);
> }
>
> static inline void intel_context_mark_active(struct intel_context *ce)
> @@ -222,8 +226,11 @@ static inline void intel_context_exit(struct intel_context *ce)
> {
> lockdep_assert_held(&ce->timeline->mutex);
> GEM_BUG_ON(!ce->active_count);
> - if (!--ce->active_count)
> - ce->ops->exit(ce);
> + if (--ce->active_count)
> + return;
> +
> + intel_gt_pm_put_async(ce->vm->gt);
> + ce->ops->exit(ce);
> }
>
> static inline struct intel_context *intel_context_get(struct intel_context *ce)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pm.c
> index e971b153fda976..ee531a5c142c77 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pm.c
> @@ -114,6 +114,15 @@ __queue_and_release_pm(struct i915_request *rq,
>
> ENGINE_TRACE(engine, "parking\n");
>
> + /*
> + * Open coded one half of intel_context_enter, which we have to omit
> + * here (see the large comment below) and because the other part must
> + * not be called due constructing directly with __i915_request_create
> + * which increments active count via intel_context_mark_active.
> + */
> + GEM_BUG_ON(rq->context->active_count != 1);
> + __intel_gt_pm_get(engine->gt);
> +
> /*
> * We have to serialise all potential retirement paths with our
> * submission, as we don't want to underflow either the
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...el.com>
Regards,
Tvrtko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists