[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230403065013.520339-1-bbara93@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2023 08:50:13 +0200
From: Benjamin Bara <bbara93@...il.com>
To: dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com
Cc: bbara93@...il.com, benjamin.bara@...data.com, jonathanh@...dia.com,
lee@...nel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com, richard.leitner@...ux.dev,
treding@...dia.com, wsa@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] mfd: tps6586x: register restart handler
Thanks for the feedback!
The DS states: "When the reboot request state is set an internal timer TWAIT
(10ms typ) is started. The reboot request ends when t > TWAIT."
Therefore, my intention was to wait a little bit before starting the next
handler in the chain. I can do some tests without the mdelay, but otherwise
will reduce it to 15ms in the next patch. What do you think about it?
BR,
Benjamin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists