[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87iledbbkc.fsf@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2023 11:43:31 +0300
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
Wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>,
Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@...iatek.com>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-next tree with the wireless tree
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> writes:
> Hi all,
>
> On Fri, 31 Mar 2023 10:49:59 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>>
>> Today's linux-next merge of the wireless-next tree got a conflict in:
>>
>> net/mac80211/rx.c
>>
>> between commit:
>>
>> a16fc38315f2 ("wifi: mac80211: fix potential null pointer dereference")
>>
>> from the wireless tree and commit:
>>
>> fe4a6d2db3ba ("wifi: mac80211: implement support for yet another mesh A-MSDU format")
>>
>> from the wireless-next tree.
>>
>> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
>> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
>> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
>> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
>> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
>> complex conflicts.
[...]
> This is now a conflict between the net-next and net trees.
My plan is to submit wireless-next pull request to net-next by
Wednesday, that should fix the conflict.
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
Powered by blists - more mailing lists