[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZCqjlsd63M6WOc/+@alley>
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2023 11:59:50 +0200
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: Stanislav Kinsburskii <skinsburskii@...ux.microsoft.com>
Cc: Stanislav Kinsburskii <stanislav.kinsburski@...il.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk: Remove obsoleted check for non-existent "user"
object
On Mon 2023-03-20 00:02:01, Stanislav Kinsburskii wrote:
> From: Stanislav Kinsburskii <stanislav.kinsburski@...il.com>
>
> The original check for non-null "user" object was introduced by commit
> e11fea92e13f ("kmsg: export printk records to the /dev/kmsg interface") when
> "user" could be NULL if /dev/ksmg was opened for writing.
>
> Subsequent change 750afe7babd1 ("printk: add kernel parameter to control
> writes to /dev/kmsg") made "user" context required for files opened for write,
> but didn't remove now redundant checks for it to be non-NULL.
>
> This patch removes the dead code while preserving the current logic.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Kinsburskii <stanislav.kinsburski@...il.com>
Yup, it looks safe.
Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Best Regards,
Petr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists