[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <789f5aaa-77fa-d656-95d2-ec75857fa266@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2023 23:59:29 +0900
From: Chanwoo Choi <cwchoi00@...il.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Bumwoo Lee <bw365.lee@...sung.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 11/14] extcon: Remove dup device name in the message
and unneeded error check
On 23. 3. 22. 23:40, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> The device name is already printed with dev_err(), no need to repeat.
> The device pointer itself is not supposed to be an error point, drop
> that check.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/extcon/extcon.c | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon.c
> index 32e96cb49067..0e04ea185c26 100644
> --- a/drivers/extcon/extcon.c
> +++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon.c
> @@ -1367,9 +1367,8 @@ void extcon_dev_unregister(struct extcon_dev *edev)
> list_del(&edev->entry);
> mutex_unlock(&extcon_dev_list_lock);
>
> - if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(get_device(&edev->dev))) {
> - dev_err(&edev->dev, "Failed to unregister extcon_dev (%s)\n",
> - dev_name(&edev->dev));
> + if (!get_device(&edev->dev)) {
> + dev_err(&edev->dev, "Failed to unregister extcon_dev\n");
> return;
> }
>
Applied it. Thanks.
--
Best Regards,
Samsung Electronics
Chanwoo Choi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists