[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7bd6967a-7f0b-575f-d972-3bf98fab5a6a@seco.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2023 11:22:12 -0400
From: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...o.com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Cc: Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Scott Wood <oss@...error.net>,
Camelia Groza <camelia.groza@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Roy Pledge <roy.pledge@....com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] soc: fsl: qbman: Always disable interrupts when
taking cgr_lock
On 4/3/23 10:02, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 11:14:12AM -0400, Sean Anderson wrote:
>> smp_call_function_single disables IRQs when executing the callback. To
>> prevent deadlocks, we must disable IRQs when taking cgr_lock elsewhere.
>> This is already done by qman_update_cgr and qman_delete_cgr; fix the
>> other lockers.
>>
>> Fixes: c535e923bb97 ("soc/fsl: Introduce DPAA 1.x QMan device driver")
>
> If you've identified smp_call_function_single() as the problem, then the
> true issue seems to lie in commit 96f413f47677 ("soc/fsl/qbman: fix
> issue in qman_delete_cgr_safe()") and not in the initial commit, no?
Yes, that seems better. I did a blame and saw that qman_delete_cgr_safe
had been around since the initial driver, but I didn't realize it worked
in a different way back then.
--Sean
> Anyway,
>
> Tested-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists