[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7f07f8ea-cc26-7655-00de-4ab21bc4b0e7@amd.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2023 13:46:50 +0530
From: "Nikunj A. Dadhania" <nikunj@....com>
To: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Cc: bp@...en8.de, dionnaglaze@...gle.com, pgonda@...gle.com,
seanjc@...gle.com, pbonzini@...hat.com, michael.roth@....com,
ketanch@...k.ac.in
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/11] x86/kvmclock: Use Secure TSC as clock if
available
On 4/4/2023 3:15 AM, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> On 3/26/23 09:46, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
>> For AMD SNP guests having Secure TSC enabled, use Secure TSC based
>> clocksource instead of kvmclock.
>
> This patch only results in skipping the initialization of KVM clock, it doesn't cause Secure TSC to be used as the clocksource.
>
Will update the commit message and reorder with 10/11. After making TSC reliable and skipping kvmclock, secure tsc is used as clocksource.
Regards
Nikunj
Powered by blists - more mailing lists