[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZC0uzt+8olV4qzEC@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2023 11:18:22 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Chanwoo Choi <cwchoi00@...il.com>
Cc: Bumwoo Lee <bw365.lee@...sung.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 14/14] extcon: Use positive conditional in ternary
operator
On Mon, Apr 03, 2023 at 11:38:41PM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> On 23. 3. 22. 23:40, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > It's easier to parse by a human being the positive conditional.
...
> > const char *extcon_get_edev_name(struct extcon_dev *edev)
> > {
> > - return !edev ? NULL : edev->name;
> > + return edev ? edev->name : NULL;
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(extcon_get_edev_name);
>
> It is not fix-up patch and I'm not sure that it is beneficial patch.
> I will not apply it.
It improves the cognitive perception of the code, but I'm fine with
no patch being applied.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists