linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] iio: addac: stx104: Improve indentation in stx104_write

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZC02QAYZodp/cgi5@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 5 Apr 2023 11:50:08 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     William Breathitt Gray <william.gray@...aro.org>
Cc:     Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] iio: addac: stx104: Improve indentation in
 stx104_write_raw()

On Tue, Apr 04, 2023 at 10:12:00AM -0400, William Breathitt Gray wrote:
> By bailing out early if chan->output is false for the IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW,
> indentation can be decreased by a tab and code readability improved.

...

> +		/* DAC can only accept up to a 16-bit value */
> +		if ((unsigned int)val > 65535)
> +			return -EINVAL;

While the patch is good per se, I don't like two things (which are also in the
original code):
- explicit casting (can it be avoided?)
- would be good to have U16_MAX or ?.. instead of hard coded number

Can it be addressed with (additional) patches?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko