lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 5 Apr 2023 13:36:19 +0200
From:   Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To:     Varadarajan Narayanan <quic_varada@...cinc.com>,
        Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande@...cinc.com>
Cc:     agross@...nel.org, andersson@...nel.org, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org,
        vkoul@...nel.org, kishon@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org, quic_wcheng@...cinc.com,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 7/8] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq9574: Add USB related nodes

On Wed, Apr 05, 2023 at 03:24:04PM +0530, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
> Add USB phy and controller related nodes
> 
> Signed-off-by: Varadarajan Narayanan <quic_varada@...cinc.com>
> ---
>  Changes in v7:
> 	- Change com_aux -> cfg_ahb
>  Changes in v6:
> 	- Introduce fixed regulators for the phy
> 	- Resolved all 'make dtbs_check' messages

> +		usb_0_qmpphy: phy@...00 {
> +			compatible = "qcom,ipq9574-qmp-usb3-phy";
> +			reg = <0x0007d000 0xa00>;
> +			#phy-cells = <0>;
> +
> +			clocks = <&gcc GCC_USB0_AUX_CLK>,
> +				 <&xo_board_clk>,
> +				 <&gcc GCC_USB0_PHY_CFG_AHB_CLK>,
> +				 <&gcc GCC_USB0_PIPE_CLK>;
> +			clock-names = "aux",
> +				      "ref",
> +				      "cfg_ahb",

You still did not update the binding to match this clock. So this is
essentially the third time I'm pointing out the same issue. This is
simply not acceptable.

Just slow down, and don't rush out new revisions of series before
you've had time to review them yourself (and preferably internally at
qualcomm) to make sure that you have addressed all review comments you
have received.

Maintainer and reviewer time is scarce. Our development model really
does not scale unless people take more care.

Johan

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ