[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <168069754829.50839.3429287671431516828.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2023 13:25:48 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Liam.Howlett@...cle.com, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] regmap: Use mas_walk() instead of mas_find()
On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 20:42:28 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> Liam recommends using mas_walk() instead of mas_find() for our use case so
> let's do that, it avoids some minor overhead associated with being able to
> restart the operation which we don't need since we do a simple search.
>
>
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regmap.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/1] regmap: Use mas_walk() instead of mas_find()
commit: fac79bad889bb167a37492181646992c8c48903b
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.
Thanks,
Mark
Powered by blists - more mailing lists