Message-ID: <CABb0KFHZpYVML2e+Xg9+kwjyhqQkikPBhymO=EXoQnO2xjfG4g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 6 Apr 2023 17:52:40 +0200
From:   Michał Mirosław <emmir@...gle.com>
To:     Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>
Cc:     Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>, David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andrei Vagin <avagin@...il.com>,
        Danylo Mocherniuk <mdanylo@...gle.com>,
        Paul Gofman <pgofman@...eweavers.com>,
        Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>, Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
        Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        "Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
        Yun Zhou <yun.zhou@...driver.com>,
        Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
        Alex Sierra <alex.sierra@....com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>,
        Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>,
        "Gustavo A . R . Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 2/5] fs/proc/task_mmu: Implement IOCTL to get and
 optionally clear info about PTEs

On Thu, 6 Apr 2023 at 09:40, Muhammad Usama Anjum
<usama.anjum@...labora.com> wrote:>
> This IOCTL, PAGEMAP_SCAN on pagemap file can be used to get and/or clear
> the info about page table entries. The following operations are supported
> in this ioctl:
> - Get the information if the pages have been written-to (PAGE_IS_WRITTEN),
>   file mapped (PAGE_IS_FILE), present (PAGE_IS_PRESENT) or swapped
>   (PAGE_IS_SWAPPED).
> - Find pages which have been written-to and write protect the pages
>   (atomic PAGE_IS_WRITTEN + PAGEMAP_WP_ENGAGE)
>
> This IOCTL can be extended to get information about more PTE bits.
[...]
> --- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
[...]
> +static inline bool is_pte_uffd_wp(pte_t pte)
> +{
> +       return ((pte_present(pte) && pte_uffd_wp(pte)) ||
> +               pte_swp_uffd_wp_any(pte));

Nit: outer parentheses are not needed for `return`ed value -- please
remove. (Same in other places.)

> @@ -1768,11 +1789,416 @@ static int pagemap_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> +#define PM_SCAN_FOUND_MAX_PAGES        (1)
> +#define PM_SCAN_BITS_ALL       (PAGE_IS_WRITTEN | PAGE_IS_FILE |       \
> +                                PAGE_IS_PRESENT | PAGE_IS_SWAPPED)
> +#define PM_SCAN_OPS            (PM_SCAN_OP_GET | PM_SCAN_OP_WP)
> +#define PM_SCAN_OP_IS_WP(a)    (a->flags & PM_SCAN_OP_WP)

Nit: PM_SCAN_DO_UFFD_WP()? It would shift the hint in the name from
what op is executed to what behaviour is requested.

> +#define PM_SCAN_BITMAP(wt, file, present, swap)        \
> +       (wt | file << 1 | present << 2 | swap << 3)

Please parenthesize macro arguments ("(wt)", "(file)", etc.) to not
have to worry about operator precedence when passed a complex
expression.

I

[...]
> +static inline bool pagemap_scan_is_written_set(struct pagemap_scan_private *p)

pagemap_scan_checks_page_written? or similar 'scan is written' doesn't
seem to convey the expected intention.
The function is used only once in ..._test_walk(), so maybe just
inline, possibly using a temporary `bool` to make the condition easier
to read?

[...]

> +static int pagemap_scan_output(bool wt, bool file, bool pres, bool swap,

Could you try out how the code would look when passing the bitmap
instead of separate booleans?

> +                              struct pagemap_scan_private *p,
> +                              unsigned long addr, unsigned int n_pages)
> +{
[...]
> +       if ((cur->start + cur->len * PAGE_SIZE == addr) &&
> +           (cur->bitmap == bitmap)) {

Nit: bitmap check is cheaper, so I'd put it first. BTW, inner
parentheses are not needed here.

> +               cur->len += n_pages;
> +               p->found_pages += n_pages;
> +
> +               if (p->max_pages && (p->found_pages == p->max_pages))
> +                       return PM_SCAN_FOUND_MAX_PAGES;
> +
> +               return 0;
> +       }
> +
> +       if (!p->vec_index || ((p->vec_index + 1) < p->vec_len)) {

It looks that `if (p->vec_index < p->vec_len)` is enough here - if we
have vec_len == 0 here, then we'd not fit the entry in the userspace
buffer anyway. Am I missing something?

> +
> +               if (cur->len) {
> +                       memcpy(&p->vec[p->vec_index], cur,
> +                              sizeof(struct page_region));
> +                       p->vec_index++;
> +               }
> +               cur->start = addr;
> +               cur->len = n_pages;
> +               cur->bitmap = bitmap;
> +               p->found_pages += n_pages;
> +
> +               if (p->max_pages && (p->found_pages == p->max_pages))
> +                       return PM_SCAN_FOUND_MAX_PAGES;
> +
> +               return 0;
> +       }
> +
> +       return -ENOSPC;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int pagemap_scan_deposit(struct pagemap_scan_private *p,
> +                                      struct page_region __user *vec,
> +                                      unsigned long *vec_index)

..._deposit() is used only in single place - please inline.

[...]
> +static int pagemap_scan_pmd_entry(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long start,
> +                                 unsigned long end, struct mm_walk *walk)
> +{
> +       struct pagemap_scan_private *p = walk->private;
> +       bool is_written, is_file, is_present, is_swap;
> +       struct vm_area_struct *vma = walk->vma;
> +       unsigned long addr = end;
> +       spinlock_t *ptl;
> +       int ret = 0;
> +       pte_t *pte;
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
> +       ptl = pmd_trans_huge_lock(pmd, vma);
> +       if (ptl) {

Nit: `page_lock` or `pt_lock` to make it easier to guess the purpose?

> +               unsigned long n_pages = (end - start)/PAGE_SIZE;
> +
> +               is_written = !is_pmd_uffd_wp(*pmd);
> +               is_file = vma->vm_file;
> +               is_present = pmd_present(*pmd);
> +               is_swap = is_swap_pmd(*pmd);
> +
> +               spin_unlock(ptl);
> +
> +               /*
> +                * Break huge page into small pages if the WP operation need to
> +                * be performed is on a portion of the huge page or if max_pages
> +                * pages limit would exceed.

BTW, could the `max_pages` limit be relaxed a bit (in that it would be
possible to return more pages if they all merge into the last vector
entry) so that it would not need to split otherwise-matching huge
page? It would remove the need for this special handling in the kernel
and splitting the page by this read-only-appearing ioctl?

> +                */
> +               if (is_written && PM_SCAN_OP_IS_WP(p) &&
> +                   ((end - start < HPAGE_SIZE) ||
> +                    (p->max_pages &&
> +                     (p->max_pages - p->found_pages) < n_pages))) {
> +
> +                       split_huge_pmd(vma, pmd, start);
> +                       goto process_smaller_pages;
> +               }
> +
> +               if (p->max_pages &&
> +                   p->found_pages + n_pages > p->max_pages)
> +                       n_pages = p->max_pages - p->found_pages;
> +
> +               ret = pagemap_scan_output(is_written, is_file, is_present,
> +                                         is_swap, p, start, n_pages);
> +               if (ret < 0)
> +                       return ret;
> +
> +               if (is_written && PM_SCAN_OP_IS_WP(p) &&
> +                   uffd_wp_range(vma, start, HPAGE_SIZE, true) < 0)
> +                       ret = -EINVAL;

Why not propagate the error from uffd_wp_range()?

[...]
> +static long do_pagemap_cmd(struct mm_struct *mm,
> +                          struct pm_scan_arg __user *uarg)

Please rename the function to `do_pagemap_scan` as it implements just
this single ioctl now.

> +{
[...]
> +       start = (unsigned long)untagged_addr(arg.start);
> +       vec = (struct page_region *)(unsigned long)untagged_addr(arg.vec);

Is the inner cast needed?

> +       ret = pagemap_scan_args_valid(&arg, start, vec);
> +       if (ret)
> +               return ret;
> +
> +       end = start + arg.len;
> +       p.max_pages = arg.max_pages;
> +       p.found_pages = 0;
> +       p.flags = arg.flags;
> +       p.required_mask = arg.required_mask;
> +       p.anyof_mask = arg.anyof_mask;
> +       p.excluded_mask = arg.excluded_mask;
> +       p.return_mask = arg.return_mask;
> +       p.cur.len = 0;
> +       p.cur.start = 0;
> +       p.vec = NULL;
> +       p.vec_len = (PAGEMAP_WALK_SIZE >> PAGE_SHIFT);

Nit: parentheses are not needed here, please remove.

> +
> +       /*
> +        * Allocate smaller buffer to get output from inside the page walk
> +        * functions and walk page range in PAGEMAP_WALK_SIZE size chunks. As
> +        * we want to return output to user in compact form where no two
> +        * consecutive regions should be continuous and have the same flags.
> +        * So store the latest element in p.cur between different walks and
> +        * store the p.cur at the end of the walk to the user buffer.
> +        */
> +       p.vec = kmalloc_array(p.vec_len, sizeof(struct page_region),
> +                             GFP_KERNEL);
> +       if (!p.vec)
> +               return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +       walk_start = walk_end = start;
> +       while (walk_end < end && !ret) {

The loop will stop if a previous iteration returned ENOSPC (and the
error will be lost) - is it intended?

> +               p.vec_index = 0;
> +
> +               empty_slots = arg.vec_len - vec_index;
> +               p.vec_len = min(p.vec_len, empty_slots);
> +
> +               walk_end = (walk_start + PAGEMAP_WALK_SIZE) & PAGEMAP_WALK_MASK;
> +               if (walk_end > end)
> +                       walk_end = end;
> +
> +               mmap_read_lock(mm);
> +               ret = walk_page_range(mm, walk_start, walk_end,
> +                                     &pagemap_scan_ops, &p);
> +               mmap_read_unlock(mm);
> +
> +               if (ret && ret != -ENOSPC && ret != PM_SCAN_FOUND_MAX_PAGES)
> +                       goto free_data;
> +
> +               walk_start = walk_end;
> +               if (p.vec_index) {
> +                       if (copy_to_user(&vec[vec_index], p.vec,
> +                                        p.vec_index *
> +                                        sizeof(struct page_region))) {

sizeof(*p.vec) ?

> +                               ret = -EFAULT;
> +                               goto free_data;
> +                       }
> +                       vec_index += p.vec_index;
> +               }
> +       }
> +       ret = pagemap_scan_deposit(&p, vec, &vec_index);
> +       if (!ret)
> +               ret = vec_index;
> +free_data:
> +       kfree(p.vec);
> +
> +       return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static long pagemap_scan_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
> +                              unsigned long arg)
> +{
> +       struct pm_scan_arg __user *uarg = (struct pm_scan_arg __user *)arg;

This is specific to PAGEMAP_SCAN ioctl, so should go into do_pagemap_cmd().

> +       struct mm_struct *mm = file->private_data;
> +
> +       switch (cmd) {
> +       case PAGEMAP_SCAN:
> +               return do_pagemap_cmd(mm, uarg);
[...]
> --- a/include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h
> +++ b/include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h
> @@ -210,6 +210,14 @@ extern bool userfaultfd_wp_async(struct vm_area_struct *vma);
>
>  #else /* CONFIG_USERFAULTFD */
>
> +static inline long uffd_wp_range(struct mm_struct *dst_mm,
> +                                struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> +                                unsigned long start, unsigned long len,
> +                                bool enable_wp)
> +{
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
>  /* mm helpers */
>  static inline vm_fault_t handle_userfault(struct vm_fault *vmf,
>                                 unsigned long reason)

Shouldn't this part be in the patch introducing uffd_wp_range()?

Best Regards
Michał Mirosław

Powered by blists - more mailing lists