| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAJD7tkaDcCDhBdM+CwpmZYtaJL1JqsRzt9CXTH_+rzprM9eZ0A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 10:43:26 -0700
From: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>
To: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>,
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>, NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] mm: vmscan: refactor reclaim_state helpers
On Thu, Apr 6, 2023 at 10:32 AM Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2023-04-05 at 18:54 +0000, Yosry Ahmed wrote:
> > During reclaim, we keep track of pages reclaimed from other means than
> > LRU-based reclaim through scan_control->reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab,
> > which we stash a pointer to in current task_struct.
> >
> > However, we keep track of more than just reclaimed slab pages through
> > this. We also use it for clean file pages dropped through pruned inodes,
> > and xfs buffer pages freed. Rename reclaimed_slab to reclaimed, and add
> > a helper function that wraps updating it through current, so that future
> > changes to this logic are contained within mm/vmscan.c.
> >
> > Additionally, add a flush_reclaim_state() helper to wrap using
> > reclaim_state->reclaimed to updated sc->nr_reclaimed, and use that
> > helper to add an elaborate comment about why we only do the update for
> > global reclaim.
> >
> > Finally, move set_task_reclaim_state() next to flush_reclaim_state() so
> > that all reclaim_state helpers are in close proximity for easier
> > readability.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>
> > ---
> > fs/inode.c | 3 +-
> > fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | 3 +-
> > include/linux/swap.h | 17 +++++++++-
> > mm/slab.c | 3 +-
> > mm/slob.c | 6 ++--
> > mm/slub.c | 5 ++-
> > mm/vmscan.c | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> > 7 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c
> > index 4558dc2f13557..e60fcc41faf17 100644
> > --- a/fs/inode.c
> > +++ b/fs/inode.c
> > @@ -864,8 +864,7 @@ static enum lru_status inode_lru_isolate(struct list_head *item,
> > __count_vm_events(KSWAPD_INODESTEAL, reap);
> > else
> > __count_vm_events(PGINODESTEAL, reap);
> > - if (current->reclaim_state)
> > - current->reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab += reap;
> > + mm_account_reclaimed_pages(reap);
> > }
> > iput(inode);
> > spin_lock(lru_lock);
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> > index 54c774af6e1c6..15d1e5a7c2d34 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> > @@ -286,8 +286,7 @@ xfs_buf_free_pages(
> > if (bp->b_pages[i])
> > __free_page(bp->b_pages[i]);
> > }
> > - if (current->reclaim_state)
> > - current->reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab += bp->b_page_count;
> > + mm_account_reclaimed_pages(bp->b_page_count);
> >
> > if (bp->b_pages != bp->b_page_array)
> > kmem_free(bp->b_pages);
> > diff --git a/include/linux/swap.h b/include/linux/swap.h
> > index 209a425739a9f..e131ac155fb95 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/swap.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/swap.h
> > @@ -153,13 +153,28 @@ union swap_header {
> > * memory reclaim
> > */
> > struct reclaim_state {
> > - unsigned long reclaimed_slab;
> > + /* pages reclaimed outside of LRU-based reclaim */
> > + unsigned long reclaimed;
> > #ifdef CONFIG_LRU_GEN
> > /* per-thread mm walk data */
> > struct lru_gen_mm_walk *mm_walk;
> > #endif
> > };
> >
> > +/*
> > + * mm_account_reclaimed_pages(): account reclaimed pages outside of LRU-based
> > + * reclaim
> > + * @pages: number of pages reclaimed
> > + *
> > + * If the current process is undergoing a reclaim operation, increment the
> > + * number of reclaimed pages by @pages.
> > + */
> > +static inline void mm_account_reclaimed_pages(unsigned long pages)
> > +{
> > + if (current->reclaim_state)
> > + current->reclaim_state->reclaimed += pages;
> > +}
> > +
> > #ifdef __KERNEL__
> >
> > struct address_space;
> > diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c
> > index dabc2a671fc6f..64bf1de817b24 100644
> > --- a/mm/slab.c
> > +++ b/mm/slab.c
> > @@ -1392,8 +1392,7 @@ static void kmem_freepages(struct kmem_cache *cachep, struct slab *slab)
> > smp_wmb();
> > __folio_clear_slab(folio);
> >
> > - if (current->reclaim_state)
> > - current->reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab += 1 << order;
> > + mm_account_reclaimed_pages(1 << order);
> > unaccount_slab(slab, order, cachep);
> > __free_pages(&folio->page, order);
> > }
> > diff --git a/mm/slob.c b/mm/slob.c
> > index fe567fcfa3a39..79cc8680c973c 100644
> > --- a/mm/slob.c
> > +++ b/mm/slob.c
> > @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@
> > #include <linux/slab.h>
> >
> > #include <linux/mm.h>
> > -#include <linux/swap.h> /* struct reclaim_state */
> > +#include <linux/swap.h> /* mm_account_reclaimed_pages() */
> > #include <linux/cache.h>
> > #include <linux/init.h>
> > #include <linux/export.h>
> > @@ -211,9 +211,7 @@ static void slob_free_pages(void *b, int order)
> > {
> > struct page *sp = virt_to_page(b);
> >
> > - if (current->reclaim_state)
> > - current->reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab += 1 << order;
> > -
> > + mm_account_reclaimed_pages(1 << order);
> > mod_node_page_state(page_pgdat(sp), NR_SLAB_UNRECLAIMABLE_B,
> > -(PAGE_SIZE << order));
> > __free_pages(sp, order);
> > diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> > index 39327e98fce34..7aa30eef82350 100644
> > --- a/mm/slub.c
> > +++ b/mm/slub.c
> > @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
> > */
> >
> > #include <linux/mm.h>
> > -#include <linux/swap.h> /* struct reclaim_state */
> > +#include <linux/swap.h> /* mm_account_reclaimed_pages() */
> > #include <linux/module.h>
> > #include <linux/bit_spinlock.h>
> > #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> > @@ -2063,8 +2063,7 @@ static void __free_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab)
> > /* Make the mapping reset visible before clearing the flag */
> > smp_wmb();
> > __folio_clear_slab(folio);
> > - if (current->reclaim_state)
> > - current->reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab += pages;
> > + mm_account_reclaimed_pages(pages);
> > unaccount_slab(slab, order, s);
> > __free_pages(&folio->page, order);
> > }
> > diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> > index c82bd89f90364..049e39202e6ce 100644
> > --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> > +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> > @@ -188,18 +188,6 @@ struct scan_control {
> > */
> > int vm_swappiness = 60;
> >
> > -static void set_task_reclaim_state(struct task_struct *task,
> > - struct reclaim_state *rs)
> > -{
> > - /* Check for an overwrite */
> > - WARN_ON_ONCE(rs && task->reclaim_state);
> > -
> > - /* Check for the nulling of an already-nulled member */
> > - WARN_ON_ONCE(!rs && !task->reclaim_state);
> > -
> > - task->reclaim_state = rs;
> > -}
> > -
> > LIST_HEAD(shrinker_list);
> > DECLARE_RWSEM(shrinker_rwsem);
> >
> > @@ -511,6 +499,59 @@ static bool writeback_throttling_sane(struct scan_control *sc)
> > }
> > #endif
> >
> > +static void set_task_reclaim_state(struct task_struct *task,
> > + struct reclaim_state *rs)
> > +{
> > + /* Check for an overwrite */
> > + WARN_ON_ONCE(rs && task->reclaim_state);
> > +
> > + /* Check for the nulling of an already-nulled member */
> > + WARN_ON_ONCE(!rs && !task->reclaim_state);
> > +
> > + task->reclaim_state = rs;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * flush_reclaim_state(): add pages reclaimed outside of LRU-based reclaim to
> > + * scan_control->nr_reclaimed.
> > + */
> > +static void flush_reclaim_state(struct scan_control *sc,
> > + struct reclaim_state *rs)
> > +{
> > + /*
> > + * Currently, reclaim_state->reclaimed includes three types of pages
> > + * freed outside of vmscan:
> > + * (1) Slab pages.
> > + * (2) Clean file pages from pruned inodes.
> > + * (3) XFS freed buffer pages.
> > + *
> > + * For all of these cases, we have no way of finding out whether these
> > + * pages were related to the memcg under reclaim. For example, a freed
> > + * slab page could have had only a single object charged to the memcg
>
> Minor nits:
> s/could have had/could have
>
> > + * under reclaim. Also, populated inodes are not on shrinker LRUs
> > + * anymore except on highmem systems.
> > + *
> > + * Instead of over-reporting the reclaimed pages in a memcg reclaim,
> > + * only count such pages in global reclaim. This prevents unnecessary
>
> May be clearer to say:
> This prevents under-reclaimaing the target memcg, and unnecessary
Thanks, will rephrase for the next version!
>
> > + * retries during memcg charging and false positive from proactive
> > + * reclaim (memory.reclaim).
> > + *
>
> Tim
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists