[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <028a1b56-72c9-75f6-fb68-1dc5181bf2e8@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 11:52:39 +0800
From: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Yangtao Li <frank.li@...o.com>, Gao Xiang <xiang@...nel.org>,
Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>, Yue Hu <huyue2@...lpad.com>,
Jeffle Xu <jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] erofs: remove unnecessary kobject_del()
Hi Yangtao,
On 2023/4/4 22:21, Yangtao Li wrote:
> kobject_put() actually covers kobject removal automatically, which is
> single stage removal. So it is safe to kill kobject_del() directly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@...o.com>
Would you mind taking a look at
commit a942da24abc5 ("fs: erofs: add sanity check for kobject in erofs_unregister_sysfs")
, which could be "git-blame"ed (I'd suggest looking into these
blame first), and the related discussion was:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAD-N9QXNx=p3-QoWzk6pCznF32CZy8kM3vvo8mamfZZ9CpUKdw@mail.gmail.com
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220315075152.63789-1-dzm91@hust.edu.cn
TL;DR: I guess it could be fixed as below if kobject_del() could
be killed safely:
if (sbi->s_kobj.state_in_sysfs) {
kobject_put(&sbi->s_kobj);
wait_for_completion(&sbi->s_kobj_unregister);
}
Thanks,
Gao Xiang
> ---
> fs/erofs/sysfs.c | 7 ++-----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/erofs/sysfs.c b/fs/erofs/sysfs.c
> index 435e515c0792..c3ba981b4472 100644
> --- a/fs/erofs/sysfs.c
> +++ b/fs/erofs/sysfs.c
> @@ -240,11 +240,8 @@ void erofs_unregister_sysfs(struct super_block *sb)
> {
> struct erofs_sb_info *sbi = EROFS_SB(sb);
>
> - if (sbi->s_kobj.state_in_sysfs) {
> - kobject_del(&sbi->s_kobj);
> - kobject_put(&sbi->s_kobj);
> - wait_for_completion(&sbi->s_kobj_unregister);
> - }
> + kobject_put(&sbi->s_kobj);
> + wait_for_completion(&sbi->s_kobj_unregister);
> }
>
> int __init erofs_init_sysfs(void)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists