linux-kernel - Re: Re: [PATCH v2] mm: oom: introduce cpuset oom

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 6 Apr 2023 21:02:17 +0800
From:   Gang Li <ligang.bdlg@...edance.com>
To:     Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Cc:     rientjes@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Zefan Li <lizefan.x@...edance.com>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH v2] mm: oom: introduce cpuset oom

On 2023/4/5 01:24, Waiman Long wrote:
> 
> You will also need to take cpuset_rwsem to make sure that cpusets are 
> stable. BTW, the cpuset_cgroup_scan_tasks() name is kind of redundant. I 
> will suggest you just name it as cpuset_scan_tasks(). Please also add a 

mem cgroup oom use `mem_cgroup_scan_tasks`.
How about keep `cpuset_cgroup_scan_tasks` for naming consistency?

```
static void select_bad_process(struct oom_control *oc)
{
	oc->chosen_points = LONG_MIN;

	if (is_memcg_oom(oc))
		mem_cgroup_scan_tasks(oc->memcg, oom_evaluate_task, oc);
	else if (oc->constraint == CONSTRAINT_CPUSET)
		cpuset_cgroup_scan_tasks(oom_evaluate_task, oc);
	else {
		...
	}
}
```