linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] mfd: intel-m10-bmc: Move core symbols to own namespace

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZC+3msi6ovoF55tr@yilunxu-OptiPlex-7050>
Date:   Fri, 7 Apr 2023 14:26:34 +0800
From:   Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@...el.com>
To:     Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Wu Hao <hao.wu@...el.com>, Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>,
        Moritz Fischer <mdf@...nel.org>, linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org,
        Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org,
        Russ Weight <russell.h.weight@...el.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] mfd: intel-m10-bmc: Move core symbols to own
 namespace

On 2023-04-05 at 11:01:49 +0300, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> Create INTEL_M10_BMC_CORE namespace for symbols exported by
> intel-m10-bmc-core.

Is it necessary for handshake register, or just an independent
improvement?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mfd/intel-m10-bmc-core.c | 2 +-
>  drivers/mfd/intel-m10-bmc-pmci.c | 1 +
>  drivers/mfd/intel-m10-bmc-spi.c  | 1 +
>  3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/intel-m10-bmc-core.c b/drivers/mfd/intel-m10-bmc-core.c
> index dac9cf7bcb4a..b94412813887 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/intel-m10-bmc-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/intel-m10-bmc-core.c
> @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ const struct attribute_group *m10bmc_dev_groups[] = {
>  	&m10bmc_group,
>  	NULL,
>  };
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(m10bmc_dev_groups);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(m10bmc_dev_groups, INTEL_M10_BMC_CORE);
>  
>  int m10bmc_dev_init(struct intel_m10bmc *m10bmc, const struct intel_m10bmc_platform_info *info)

Why this function is not included in namespace?

Thanks,
Yilun

>  {
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/intel-m10-bmc-pmci.c b/drivers/mfd/intel-m10-bmc-pmci.c
> index 8821f1876dd6..0392ef8b57d8 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/intel-m10-bmc-pmci.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/intel-m10-bmc-pmci.c
> @@ -453,3 +453,4 @@ module_dfl_driver(m10bmc_pmci_driver);
>  MODULE_DESCRIPTION("MAX10 BMC PMCI-based interface");
>  MODULE_AUTHOR("Intel Corporation");
>  MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> +MODULE_IMPORT_NS(INTEL_M10_BMC_CORE);
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/intel-m10-bmc-spi.c b/drivers/mfd/intel-m10-bmc-spi.c
> index 957200e17fed..edd266557ab9 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/intel-m10-bmc-spi.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/intel-m10-bmc-spi.c
> @@ -166,3 +166,4 @@ MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Intel MAX 10 BMC SPI bus interface");
>  MODULE_AUTHOR("Intel Corporation");
>  MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
>  MODULE_ALIAS("spi:intel-m10-bmc");
> +MODULE_IMPORT_NS(INTEL_M10_BMC_CORE);
> -- 
> 2.30.2
>