[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c535ce4a-d7da-1ce2-9883-7cefb6dd88a2@collabora.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2023 14:35:03 +0500
From: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>
To: Michał Mirosław <emmir@...gle.com>
Cc: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>,
Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrei Vagin <avagin@...il.com>,
Danylo Mocherniuk <mdanylo@...gle.com>,
Paul Gofman <pgofman@...eweavers.com>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>, Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
"Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
Yun Zhou <yun.zhou@...driver.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
Alex Sierra <alex.sierra@....com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>,
Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>,
"Gustavo A . R . Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 2/5] fs/proc/task_mmu: Implement IOCTL to get and
optionally clear info about PTEs
On 4/7/23 12:23 PM, Michał Mirosław wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Apr 2023 at 23:12, Muhammad Usama Anjum
> <usama.anjum@...labora.com> wrote:
>> On 4/7/23 1:12 AM, Michał Mirosław wrote:
>>> On Thu, 6 Apr 2023 at 09:40, Muhammad Usama Anjum
>>> <usama.anjum@...labora.com> wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>> --- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
>>>> +++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
>>> [...]
>>>> +static int pagemap_scan_pmd_entry(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long start,
>>>> + unsigned long end, struct mm_walk *walk)
>>>> +{
> [...]
>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
>>>> + ptl = pmd_trans_huge_lock(pmd, vma);
>>>> + if (ptl) {
>>> [...]
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> + }
>>>> +process_smaller_pages:
>>>> + if (pmd_trans_unstable(pmd))
>>>> + return 0;
>>>
>>> Why pmd_trans_unstable() is needed here and not only after split_huge_pmd()?
>> I'm not entirely sure. But the idea is if THP is unstable, we should
>> return. As it doesn't seem like after splitting THP can be unstable, we
>> should not check it. Do you agree with the following?
>
> The description of pmd_trans_unstable() [1] seems to indicate that it
> is needed only after split_huge_pmd().
>
> [1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.3-rc5/source/include/linux/pgtable.h#L1394
Sorry, yeah pmd_trans_unstable() is need after split. But it is also needed
in normal case when ptl is NULL to rule out the case if pmd is unstable
before performing operation on normal pages:
ptl = pmd_trans_huge_lock(pmd, vma);
if (ptl) {
...
}
if (pmd_trans_unstable(pmd))
return 0;
This file has usage examples of pmd_trans_unstable():
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.3-rc5/source/fs/proc/task_mmu.c#L634
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.3-rc5/source/fs/proc/task_mmu.c#L1195
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.3-rc5/source/fs/proc/task_mmu.c#L1543
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.3-rc5/source/fs/proc/task_mmu.c#L1887
So we are good with what we have in this patch.
>
> Best Regards
> Michał Mirosław
--
BR,
Muhammad Usama Anjum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists