[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e9afd9e1901b4ae7cff4cb4a14483125d05163c9.camel@mediatek.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2023 09:38:06 +0000
From: Bo Ye (叶波) <Bo.Ye@...iatek.com>
To: "jaegeuk@...nel.org" <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
"matthias.bgg@...il.com" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
"xiongping1@...omi.com" <xiongping1@...omi.com>,
"angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com"
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
"chao@...nel.org" <chao@...nel.org>,
"qixiaoyu1@...omi.com" <qixiaoyu1@...omi.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
Browse Zhang (张磊)
<Browse.Zhang@...iatek.com>,
Peng Zhou (周鹏) <Peng.Zhou@...iatek.com>,
Light Hsieh (謝明燈)
<Light.Hsieh@...iatek.com>,
Yongdong Zhang (张永东)
<Yongdong.Zhang@...iatek.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Qilin Tan (谭麒麟) <Qilin.Tan@...iatek.com>,
"linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: add __pack attribute for extent_info
On Sat, 2023-04-01 at 09:00 +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until
> you have verified the sender or the content.
>
>
> On 2023/3/31 17:26, Bo Ye wrote:
> > From: Qilin Tan <qilin.tan@...iatek.com>
> >
> > Need add __pack for struct extent_info to align to memory
> > layout of struct rb_entry.
>
> Jaegeuk has fixed this bug w/ below patchset, please check it:
>
>
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-f2fs-devel/20230313201216.924234-1-jaegeuk@kernel.org/
>
> Thanks,
>
OK, under verifying, I will reply with test result.
Thanks a lot!
> >
> > struct rb_entry {
> > struct rb_node rb_node; /* rb node located in rb-tree */
> > union {
> > struct {
> > unsigned int ofs; /* start offset of the entry */
> > unsigned int len; /* length of the entry */
> > };
> > unsigned long long key; /* 64-bits key */
> > } __packed;
> > };
> >
> > struct extent_info {
> > unsigned int fofs; /* start offset in a file */
> > unsigned int len; /* length of the extent */
> > union {
> > ...
> > /* block age extent_cache */
> > struct {
> > /* block age of the extent */
> > unsigned long long age;
> > /* last total blocks allocated */
> > unsigned long long last_blocks;
> > };
> > };
> >
> > The new fields(age, last_blocks) are u64 in change 71644dff4811, it
> > cause the memory alignment based on 8 bytes in some complier. So
> > the
> > field fofs and len are alloced with 8 bytes and using the last 4
> > byts.
> > Its memory is not aligned with struct rb_entry. the ofs of rb_entry
> > pointer to a invalid value and cause writing file failed.
> >
> > struct extent_info's offset should be 12 rather than 16 from the
> > beginning of struct rb_entry.
> >
> > The offset dump for the bad case as:
> > kworker/u16:6:
> > [name:f2fs&]f2fs_lookup_rb_tree_for_insert:MTK_DEBUG: ino=1629
> > re=0xc675dc08 ofs=0 re->ofs=0, re->len=68 ei=0xc675dc18 ei.fofs=68
> > ei.len=277
> >
> > Fixes: 71644dff4811 ("f2fs: add block_age-based extent cache")
> > Signed-off-by: Bo Ye <bo.ye@...iatek.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Qilin Tan <qilin.tan@...iatek.com>
> > ---
> > fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > index b0ab2062038a..7c690667a42f 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > @@ -660,7 +660,7 @@ struct extent_info {
> > unsigned long long last_blocks;
> > };
> > };
> > -};
> > +} __packed;
> >
> > struct extent_node {
> > struct rb_node rb_node; /* rb node located in rb-tree
> > */
Powered by blists - more mailing lists