[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230408221206.mi7nsquoxklgword@treble>
Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2023 15:12:06 -0700
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
To: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, keescook@...omium.org,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, bp@...en8.de, mingo@...hat.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, rostedt@...dmis.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86: make __get_wchan() use arch_stack_walk()
On Sat, Apr 08, 2023 at 01:36:06PM +0800, Qi Zheng wrote:
>
>
> On 2023/4/8 13:08, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 04:15:52PM +0800, Qi Zheng wrote:
> > > Make __get_wchan() use arch_stack_walk() directly to
> > > avoid open-coding of unwind logic.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>
> >
> > Can we just have a shared version of __get_wchan() for all
> > CONFIG_ARCH_STACKWALK arches?
>
> From a quick glance, I think it's ok, but we still need to define
> the arch's own get_wchan_cb(). I will try to do it.
Hm, why would we need to do that?
--
Josh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists