linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 0/3] Improve kernel docs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANhJrGPBdJwaoDFy=Rp38k_uSsZrzzMSSKxswwbur67YGG0ZrQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 10 Apr 2023 13:16:22 +0300
From:   Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>
To:     Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Cc:     Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>,
        Andrea Merello <andrea.merello@....it>,
        Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jagath Jog J <jagathjog1996@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 0/3] Improve kernel docs

la 8. huhtik. 2023 klo 12.34 Jonathan Cameron (jic23@...nel.org) kirjoitti:
>
> On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 15:24:15 +0300
> Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > IIO has very nice facilities for efficiently providing data from a
> > device to user (and probably also vice-versa - but I've not used that
> > direction). Getting started with IIO may not be so simple though - some
> > of the concepts like triggers and buffers are quite unique.
> >
> > This series tries to make it easier for a newcomer to write his/her first
> > IIO driver by adding some documentation to used enums. Series does not
> > provide extensive documentation but just documents those few entries I
> > have become familiar with - but it still aims to be a starting point for
> > others to add missing bits and pieces.
> >
> > This series is marked as v2 because the patch 1 was previously sent as a
> > stan-alone RFC to collect the missing channel units. RFC can be seen
> > here:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/10a855f9adc1d710150b7f647500c3c6a769f9ca.1677243698.git.mazziesaccount@gmail.com/
> >
> > Patches 2 and 3 were added as a result of discussion followed by the
> > RFC.
>
> Something odd happened on this resend. Patch 1 didn't make it to me
> or patchwork.  I'll reply to previous posting instead.
>

It seems checkpatch.pl + some of the patches were only picking the
huawei.com address. Maybe that is the reason?

This really was a resend with no changes other than rebasing it -
hence reviewing the v2 was absolutely fine. Thanks for the review!
I'll check the suggestions and send v3 later this week.

Yours,
  -- Matti