linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 0/3] Improve kernel docs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 10 Apr 2023 12:34:13 +0100
From:   Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To:     Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>
Cc:     Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>,
        Andrea Merello <andrea.merello@....it>,
        Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jagath Jog J <jagathjog1996@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 0/3] Improve kernel docs

On Mon, 10 Apr 2023 13:16:22 +0300
Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com> wrote:

> la 8. huhtik. 2023 klo 12.34 Jonathan Cameron (jic23@...nel.org) kirjoitti:
> >
> > On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 15:24:15 +0300
> > Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com> wrote:
> >  
> > > IIO has very nice facilities for efficiently providing data from a
> > > device to user (and probably also vice-versa - but I've not used that
> > > direction). Getting started with IIO may not be so simple though - some
> > > of the concepts like triggers and buffers are quite unique.
> > >
> > > This series tries to make it easier for a newcomer to write his/her first
> > > IIO driver by adding some documentation to used enums. Series does not
> > > provide extensive documentation but just documents those few entries I
> > > have become familiar with - but it still aims to be a starting point for
> > > others to add missing bits and pieces.
> > >
> > > This series is marked as v2 because the patch 1 was previously sent as a
> > > stan-alone RFC to collect the missing channel units. RFC can be seen
> > > here:
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/10a855f9adc1d710150b7f647500c3c6a769f9ca.1677243698.git.mazziesaccount@gmail.com/
> > >
> > > Patches 2 and 3 were added as a result of discussion followed by the
> > > RFC.  
> >
> > Something odd happened on this resend. Patch 1 didn't make it to me
> > or patchwork.  I'll reply to previous posting instead.
> >  
> 
> It seems checkpatch.pl + some of the patches were only picking the
> huawei.com address. Maybe that is the reason?

Nope. Patchwork gets it straight from the list and b4 gets it it from
lore.kernel.org which is also missing patch 1.

> 
> This really was a resend with no changes other than rebasing it -
> hence reviewing the v2 was absolutely fine. Thanks for the review!
> I'll check the suggestions and send v3 later this week.
Great.

I'm behind with a few other discussions including the looking at your
questions around that color sensor you want support.  So may be
a while before I circle back round to this anyway!

Jonathan

> 
> Yours,
>   -- Matti