[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <SA1PR11MB673446DC2CFD6DEDF97AC954A8959@SA1PR11MB6734.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2023 18:31:31 +0000
From: "Li, Xin3" <xin3.li@...el.com>
To: "Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"andrew.cooper3@...rix.com" <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
"Christopherson,, Sean" <seanjc@...gle.com>,
"pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"Shankar, Ravi V" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
"jiangshanlai@...il.com" <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
"Kang, Shan" <shan.kang@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v7 23/33] x86/fred: let ret_from_fork() jmp to
fred_exit_user when FRED is enabled
> On 4/4/23 03:27, Xin Li wrote:
> > --- a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
> > +++ b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
> > @@ -299,7 +299,12 @@ SYM_CODE_START_NOALIGN(ret_from_fork)
> > UNWIND_HINT_REGS
> > movq %rsp, %rdi
> > call syscall_exit_to_user_mode /* returns with IRQs disabled */
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_FRED
> > + ALTERNATIVE "jmp swapgs_restore_regs_and_return_to_usermode", \
> > + "jmp fred_exit_user", X86_FEATURE_FRED #else
> > jmp swapgs_restore_regs_and_return_to_usermode
> > +#endif
>
> Does the #ifdef really buy us anything here?
>
> I guess it might save a *TINY* amount of time at alternative processing time. But
> that doesn't really seem worth it.
You have kept saying not to use #ifdef if possible, and I tried to get if of them.
Somehow I ended up with overlooking this _unnecessary_ change, will remove.
Thanks!
Xin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists