[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5d200bb9-a41c-9075-ee43-3aad49eb7028@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2023 17:43:59 +0200
From: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@....com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, rui.zhang@...el.com,
amit.kucheria@...durent.com, amit.kachhap@...il.com,
daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
len.brown@...el.com, pavel@....cz, ionela.voinescu@....com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, mhiramat@...nel.org,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/17] PM: EM: Refactor em_cpufreq_update_efficiencies()
arguments
On 3/27/23 19:16, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 11:34 AM Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com> wrote:
>>
>> In order to prepare the code for the modifiable EM perf_state table,
>> refactor existing function em_cpufreq_update_efficiencies().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
>
> Quite obviously, this series needs ACKs from the Energy Model people.
FWIW, I tried the patch-set and everything was working well. I had
some small comments for some patches,
Regards,
Pierre
Powered by blists - more mailing lists