[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <36f9b5b8-2e80-9706-689c-0b55a81f0d12@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2023 23:41:06 +0100
From: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, rui.zhang@...el.com,
amit.kucheria@...durent.com, amit.kachhap@...il.com,
daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
len.brown@...el.com, pavel@....cz, Pierre.Gondois@....com,
ionela.voinescu@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, mhiramat@...nel.org,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/17] PM: EM: Refactor em_cpufreq_update_efficiencies()
arguments
Hi Rafael,
On 3/27/23 18:16, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 11:34 AM Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com> wrote:
>>
>> In order to prepare the code for the modifiable EM perf_state table,
>> refactor existing function em_cpufreq_update_efficiencies().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
>
> Quite obviously, this series needs ACKs from the Energy Model people.
>
My apologies, I have missed your email. Sure thing, we are going to
discuss this patch set on OSPM23. So hopefully that would help bring
some attention here and people would look at it or give it a try.
Regards,
Lukasz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists