[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZDXSjsjryXn0pHCz@fedora>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2023 17:35:10 -0400
From: William Breathitt Gray <william.gray@...aro.org>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] gpio: 104-dio-48e: Implement struct dio48e_gpio
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 10:15:54PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 02:36:23PM -0400, William Breathitt Gray wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 09:23:55PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 10:50:15AM -0400, William Breathitt Gray wrote:
> > > > A private data structure struct dio48e_gpio is introduced to facilitate
> > > > passage of the regmap and IRQ mask state for the device to the callback
> > > > dio48e_handle_mask_sync(). This is in preparation for the removal of the
> > > > handle_mask_sync() map parameter in a subsequent patch.
>
> > > What's the story with this patch?
>
> > Currently dio48e_handle_mask_sync() uses the map argument in its
> > implementation. Once the map parameter is removed, the current
> > implementation of dio48e_handle_mask_sync() will no longer build, so we
> > must adjust the implementation to no longer depend on map.
>
> I mean what's the story with getting this patch applied? It doesn't
> seem to have been reviewed...
I'm sorry, I forgot to add Linus' tag from v2 [0]. Linus, would you
confirm you're still okay with this patch?
William Breathitt Gray
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/all/CACRpkdYFSu3DAY4+EeoRk4cTkypgWg1C=UgforDO7mT96f0GDQ@mail.gmail.com/
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists