[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZDUqGCU3O7pIzn0O@lothringen>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2023 11:36:24 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
To: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/18] timer: Add comment to
get_next_timer_interrupt() description
On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 03:17:28PM +0100, Anna-Maria Behnsen wrote:
> get_next_timer_interrupt() does more than simply getting the next timer
> interrupt. The timer bases are forwarded and also marked as idle whenever
> possible.
>
> To get not confused, add a comment to function description.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
> ---
> v5: New patch, which adds only a comment to get_next_timer_interrupt()
> instead of changing the function name
> ---
> kernel/time/timer.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/time/timer.c b/kernel/time/timer.c
> index 63a8ce7177dd..ffb94bc3852f 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/timer.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/timer.c
> @@ -1915,6 +1915,10 @@ static u64 cmp_next_hrtimer_event(u64 basem, u64 expires)
> * @basej: base time jiffies
> * @basem: base time clock monotonic
> *
> + * If required, base->clk is forwarded and base is also marked as
> + * idle. Idle handling of timer bases is allowed only to be done by CPU
> + * itself.
Idle marking you mean? Because idle handling can be done remotely after
this patchset.
Thanks.
> + *
> * Returns the tick aligned clock monotonic time of the next pending
> * timer or KTIME_MAX if no timer is pending.
> */
> --
> 2.30.2
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists