[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230411141341.74133-1-starpt.official@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2023 07:13:41 -0700
From: Lin Yu Chen <starpt.official@...il.com>
To: corbet@....net
Cc: paulmck@...nel.org, frederic@...nel.org, quic_neeraju@...cinc.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, jiangshanlai@...il.com,
joel@...lfernandes.org, rcu@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Lin Yu Chen <starpt.official@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] docs: Fix typo in Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst
This commit corrects the spelling of "not" to "note" to accurately
convey the intended meaning.
Signed-off-by: Lin Yu Chen <starpt.official@...il.com>
---
Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst b/Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst
index cc361fb01ed4..bd3c58c44bef 100644
--- a/Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst
+++ b/Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ over a rather long period of time, but improvements are always welcome!
can serve as rcu_read_lock_sched(), but is less readable and
prevents lockdep from detecting locking issues.
- Please not that you *cannot* rely on code known to be built
+ Please note that you *cannot* rely on code known to be built
only in non-preemptible kernels. Such code can and will break,
especially in kernels built with CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT=y.
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists