linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] docs: Fix typo in Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ddef7eae-6fd4-4a79-881f-e99fbed48d67@paulmck-laptop>
Date:   Tue, 11 Apr 2023 21:52:19 -0700
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To:     Lin Yu Chen <starpt.official@...il.com>
Cc:     corbet@....net, frederic@...nel.org, quic_neeraju@...cinc.com,
        josh@...htriplett.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
        mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, jiangshanlai@...il.com,
        joel@...lfernandes.org, rcu@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: Fix typo in Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst

On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 07:13:41AM -0700, Lin Yu Chen wrote:
> This commit corrects the spelling of "not" to "note" to accurately
> convey the intended meaning.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lin Yu Chen <starpt.official@...il.com>

Good eyes, thank you!

However, Qiuxu Zhuo beat you to this one, please see this commit
in the -rcu tree:

e5ad8b68f8d4 ("Documentation/RCU: s/not/note/ in checklist.rst")

							Thanx, Paul

> ---
>  Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst b/Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst
> index cc361fb01ed4..bd3c58c44bef 100644
> --- a/Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst
> @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ over a rather long period of time, but improvements are always welcome!
>  	can serve as rcu_read_lock_sched(), but is less readable and
>  	prevents lockdep from detecting locking issues.
>  
> -	Please not that you *cannot* rely on code known to be built
> +	Please note that you *cannot* rely on code known to be built
>  	only in non-preemptible kernels.  Such code can and will break,
>  	especially in kernels built with CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT=y.
>  
> -- 
> 2.25.1
>