[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230411150320.GA23045@willie-the-truck>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2023 16:03:21 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>, paulmck@...nel.org,
Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] tools/nolibc/stdio: Implement vprintf()
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 03:31:10PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 12:30:04PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
> > On 4/6/23 12:43, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> > > Alternatively, if it would be more convenient for Mark to send this
> > > up via kselftest:
>
> > > Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
>
> > > It currently merges cleanly with the -rcu tree's dev branch, so this
> > > should not be a problem.
>
> > > Either way, please let me know, Mark!
>
> > I can take these through kselftest or can go through arm64
>
> > Acked-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
>
> It seems like more of a kselftest change than anything else so probably
> makes sense for it to go that way? The example user isn't really even
> needed.
Fine by me, as long as it doesn't conflict with any other arm64 selftest
changes you hope to land for 6.4.
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists