linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] tools/nolibc/stdio: Implement vprintf()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0144ab97-f34a-4803-8fdb-52340f2d73f2@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Tue, 11 Apr 2023 16:13:11 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc:     Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>, paulmck@...nel.org,
        Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] tools/nolibc/stdio: Implement vprintf()

On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 04:03:21PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 03:31:10PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> > It seems like more of a kselftest change than anything else so probably
> > makes sense for it to go that way?  The example user isn't really even
> > needed.

> Fine by me, as long as it doesn't conflict with any other arm64 selftest
> changes you hope to land for 6.4.

That shouldn't be an issue.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)