linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] tools/nolibc/stdio: Implement vprintf()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6a323775-6274-4d0c-844a-da53146c2abe@paulmck-laptop>
Date:   Tue, 11 Apr 2023 09:44:23 -0700
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] tools/nolibc/stdio: Implement vprintf()

On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 04:13:11PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 04:03:21PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 03:31:10PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> > > It seems like more of a kselftest change than anything else so probably
> > > makes sense for it to go that way?  The example user isn't really even
> > > needed.
> 
> > Fine by me, as long as it doesn't conflict with any other arm64 selftest
> > changes you hope to land for 6.4.
> 
> That shouldn't be an issue.

Shuah, looks to me like this one is yours in kselftest, then.  ;-)

							Thanx, Paul