linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] start_kernel: add no_stack

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230412220348.GA1120303@dev-arch.thelio-3990X>
Date:   Wed, 12 Apr 2023 15:03:48 -0700
From:   Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
To:     ndesaulniers@...gle.com
Cc:     "Borislav Petkov (AMD)" <bp@...en8.de>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
        Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
        Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] start_kernel: add no_stack_protector fn attr

On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 11:32:12AM -0700, ndesaulniers@...gle.com wrote:
> Back during the discussion of
> commit a9a3ed1eff36 ("x86: Fix early boot crash on gcc-10, third try")
> we discussed the need for a function attribute to control the omission
> of stack protectors on a per-function basis; at the time Clang had
> support for no_stack_protector but GCC did not. This was fixed in
> gcc-11. Now that the function attribute is available, let's start using
> it.
> 
> Callers of boot_init_stack_canary need to use this function attribute
> unless they're compiled with -fno-stack-protector, otherwise the canary
> stored in the stack slot of the caller will differ upon the call to
> boot_init_stack_canary. This will lead to a call to __stack_chk_fail
> then panic.
> 
> Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94722
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20200316130414.GC12561@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net/
> Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>

I applied this in front of Josh's series and defconfig no longer panics
on boot :)

Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>

> ---
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c           |  1 +
>  include/linux/compiler_attributes.h | 12 ++++++++++++
>  init/main.c                         |  3 ++-
>  3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> index 6b90f10a6c81..7d4c12b1abb7 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -1603,6 +1603,7 @@ static void add_cpu_to_masks(int cpu)
>  }
>  
>  /* Activate a secondary processor. */
> +__no_stack_protector
>  void start_secondary(void *unused)
>  {
>  	unsigned int cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
> diff --git a/include/linux/compiler_attributes.h b/include/linux/compiler_attributes.h
> index e659cb6fded3..84864767a56a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/compiler_attributes.h
> +++ b/include/linux/compiler_attributes.h
> @@ -255,6 +255,18 @@
>   */
>  #define __noreturn                      __attribute__((__noreturn__))
>  
> +/*
> + * Optional: only supported since GCC >= 11.1, clang >= 7.0.
> + *
> + *   gcc: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Common-Function-Attributes.html#index-no_005fstack_005fprotector-function-attribute
> + *   clang: https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AttributeReference.html#no-stack-protector-safebuffers
> + */
> +#if __has_attribute(__no_stack_protector__)
> +# define __no_stack_protector		__attribute__((__no_stack_protector__))
> +#else
> +# define __no_stack_protector
> +#endif
> +
>  /*
>   * Optional: not supported by gcc.
>   *
> diff --git a/init/main.c b/init/main.c
> index bb87b789c543..213baf7b8cb1 100644
> --- a/init/main.c
> +++ b/init/main.c
> @@ -941,7 +941,8 @@ static void __init print_unknown_bootoptions(void)
>  	memblock_free(unknown_options, len);
>  }
>  
> -asmlinkage __visible void __init __no_sanitize_address start_kernel(void)
> +asmlinkage __visible __init __no_sanitize_address __no_stack_protector
> +void start_kernel(void)
>  {
>  	char *command_line;
>  	char *after_dashes;
> 
> -- 
> 2.40.0.577.gac1e443424-goog
> 
>