[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230412220408.GB1120303@dev-arch.thelio-3990X>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 15:04:08 -0700
From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
To: ndesaulniers@...gle.com
Cc: "Borislav Petkov (AMD)" <bp@...en8.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] start_kernel: omit prevent_tail_call_optimization
for newer toolchains
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 11:32:13AM -0700, ndesaulniers@...gle.com wrote:
> prevent_tail_call_optimization was added in
> commit a9a3ed1eff36 ("x86: Fix early boot crash on gcc-10, third try")
> to work around stack canaries getting inserted into functions that would
> initialize the stack canary in the first place.
>
> Now that we have no_stack_protector function attribute (gcc-11+,
> clang-7+) and use it on start_kernel, remove the call to
> prevent_tail_call_optimization such that we may one day remove it
> outright.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
> ---
> init/main.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/init/main.c b/init/main.c
> index 213baf7b8cb1..c8503d02dfa6 100644
> --- a/init/main.c
> +++ b/init/main.c
> @@ -1152,7 +1152,12 @@ void start_kernel(void)
> /* Do the rest non-__init'ed, we're now alive */
> arch_call_rest_init();
>
> + /* Avoid stack canaries in callers of boot_init_stack_canary for gcc-10
> + * and older.
> + */
> +#if !__has_attribute(__no_stack_protector__)
> prevent_tail_call_optimization();
> +#endif
> }
>
> /* Call all constructor functions linked into the kernel. */
>
> --
> 2.40.0.577.gac1e443424-goog
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists