[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230413075106.GE4253@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 09:51:06 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: ndesaulniers@...gle.com
Cc: "Borislav Petkov (AMD)" <bp@...en8.de>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] start_kernel: omit stack canary
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 11:32:11AM -0700, ndesaulniers@...gle.com wrote:
> Nick Desaulniers (2):
> start_kernel: add no_stack_protector fn attr
> start_kernel: omit prevent_tail_call_optimization for newer toolchains
>
Your second patch has a vile comment style :-)
Other than that,
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists