[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9e6fff69b09b36cbdd96499cd0015154.squirrel@mail.panix.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 19:13:35 -0400
From: "Pierre Asselin" <pa@...ix.com>
To: "Javier Martinez Canillas" <javierm@...hat.com>
Cc: "Pierre Asselin" <pa@...ix.com>,
"Jocelyn Falempe" <jfalempe@...hat.com>,
"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
"Hans de Goede" <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
"Ard Biesheuvel" <ardb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware/sysfb: Fix wrong stride when bits-per-pixel is
calculated
(Okay, can't back out *all* of the first patch, just the assignment
to mode->stride.)
Anyway, here you go:
grub: gfxpayload=keep
[ 0.003333] Console: colour dummy device 128x48
[ 0.003333] printk: console [tty0] enabled
[ 0.419983] fbcon: Taking over console
[ 0.516198] pci 0000:01:05.0: vgaarb: setting as boot VGA device
[ 0.516229] pci 0000:01:05.0: vgaarb: bridge control possible
[ 0.516253] pci 0000:01:05.0: vgaarb: VGA device added:
decodes=io+mem,owns=io+mem,locks=none
[ 0.516288] vgaarb: loaded
[ 3.343649] simple-framebuffer simple-framebuffer.0: framebuffer at
0xd8000000, 0x300000 bytes
[ 3.343687] simple-framebuffer simple-framebuffer.0: format=r8g8b8,
mode=1024x768x24, linelength=4096
[ 3.344199] Console: switching to colour frame buffer device 128x48
[ 3.681177] simple-framebuffer simple-framebuffer.0: fb0: simplefb
registered!
[ 3.343345] sysfb: si->lfb_depth 32 si->lfb_width 1024
[ 3.343372] sysfb: si->red_size 8 si->red_pos 16
[ 3.343392] sysfb: si->green_size 8 si->green_pos 8
[ 3.343413] sysfb: si->blue_size 8 si->blue_pos 0
[ 3.343433] sysfb: si->rsvd_size 0 si->rsvd_pos 0
[ 3.343453] sysfb: bits_per_pixel 24 si->lfb_linelength 4096
[ 3.343476] sysfb: stride 3072
[ 3.343493] sysfb: format r8g8b8
So it's the rsvd_size and rsvd_pos that are bogus. The fix would be to:
1) believe si->lfb_depth
2) fill with ones a bitmask of size si->lfb_depth
3) clear chunks of bits based on si->{red,green,blue,rsvd}_{size,pos}
4) printk if the bitmask is not all zeros
5) override rsvd_{size,pos} based on the bitmask
That way you know where the 'x' goes in xrgb.
Hm. Could that fix my two boxes but cause a regression for someone else ?
What if _depth is low but the rsvd_ are right ?
Then _width and _linelength would be inconsistent with _depth but
consistent with the recomputed bits_per_pixel ? How many ways can the
firmware lie ?
We need more testers, don't we ?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists