[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d2746727-b0a1-d4ed-cb09-56ae8d3e363a@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 10:25:19 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Deming Wang <wangdeming@...pur.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
shuah@...nel.org
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/mm: Replace obsolete memalign() with
posix_memalign()
On 12.04.23 09:27, Deming Wang wrote:
> memalign() is obsolete according to its manpage.
>
> Replace memalign() with posix_memalign() and remove malloc.h include
> that was there for memalign().
>
> As a pointer is passed into posix_memalign(), initialize *p to NULL
> to silence a warning about the function's return value being used as
> uninitialized (which is not valid anyway because the error is properly
> checked before p is returned).
I don't follow how that comment here applies to the patch. What is p?
Where is it initialized to NULL?
>
> Signed-off-by: Deming Wang <wangdeming@...pur.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/mm/soft-dirty.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/soft-dirty.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/soft-dirty.c
> index 21d8830c5f24..4bb7421141a2 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/soft-dirty.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/soft-dirty.c
> @@ -80,8 +80,8 @@ static void test_hugepage(int pagemap_fd, int pagesize)
> int i, ret;
> size_t hpage_len = read_pmd_pagesize();
>
> - map = memalign(hpage_len, hpage_len);
> - if (!map)
> + ret = posix_memalign((void *)(&map), hpage_len, hpage_len);
posix_memalign expects an "void **memptr", casting to "void *" looks
weird. Further, you can drop the parentheses around &map.
ret = posix_memalign((void **)&map, hpage_len, hpage_len);
> + if (ret < 0)
> ksft_exit_fail_msg("memalign failed\n");
Better adjust the comment to "posix_memalign() failed\n"
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists