[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <66b7d0b9-9569-ddaf-89ca-5a0133074a17@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 13:56:30 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Jim Quinlan <jim2101024@...il.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Cyril Brulebois <kibi@...ian.org>,
Phil Elwell <phil@...pberrypi.com>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, james.quinlan@...adcom.com
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof WilczyĆski <kw@...ux.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM7XXX ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: PCI: brcmstb: Add two optional props
On 12/04/2023 13:49, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>
>
> On 4/12/2023 1:09 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 11/04/2023 18:59, Jim Quinlan wrote:
>>> Regarding "brcm,enable-l1ss":
>>>
>>> The Broadcom STB/CM PCIe HW -- a core that is also used by RPi SOCs --
>>> requires the driver probe() to deliberately place the HW one of three
>>> CLKREQ# modes:
>>>
>>> (a) CLKREQ# driven by the RC unconditionally
>>> (b) CLKREQ# driven by the EP for ASPM L0s, L1
>>> (c) Bidirectional CLKREQ#, as used for L1 Substates (L1SS).
>>>
>>> The HW+driver can tell the difference between downstream devices that
>>> need (a) and (b), but does not know when to configure (c). Further, the
>>> HW may cause a CPU abort on boot if guesses wrong regarding the need for
>>> (c). So we introduce the boolean "brcm,enable-l1ss" property to indicate
>>> that (c) is desired. Setting this property only makes sense when the
>>> downstream device is L1SS-capable and the OS is configured to activate
>>> this mode (e.g. policy==superpowersave).
>>>
>>> This property is already present in the Raspian version of Linux, but the
>>> upstream driver implementaion that will follow adds more details and
>>
>> typo, implementation
>>
>>> discerns between (a) and (b).
>>>
>>> Regarding "brcm,completion-timeout-us"
>>>
>>> Our HW will cause a CPU abort if the L1SS exit time is longer than the
>>> PCIe transaction completion abort timeout. We've been asked to make this
>>> configurable, so we are introducing "brcm,completion-timeout-us".
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jim Quinlan <jim2101024@...il.com>
>>
>> What happened here? Where is the changelog?
>
> It is in the cover letter:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230411165919.23955-1-jim2101024@gmail.com/
>
> but it does not look like the cover letter was copied to you or Rob.
As you said, I did not get it.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists