[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <yq18rewbmay.fsf@ca-mkp.ca.oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 21:34:00 -0400
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
To: hch@....de
Cc: Jinyoung CHOI <j-young.choi@...sung.com>,
"kbusch@...nel.org" <kbusch@...nel.org>,
"axboe@...com" <axboe@...com>,
"sagi@...mberg.me" <sagi@...mberg.me>,
"chaitanya.kulkarni@....com" <chaitanya.kulkarni@....com>,
"linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
martin.petersen@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] nvme-pci: fix metadata mapping length
>> Even if the memory allocated for integrity is physically continuous,
>> struct bio_vec is composed separately for each page size.
>> In order not to use the blk_rq_map_integrity_sg(), the length of the
>> DMA mapping should be the total size of integrity payload.
>
> Hmm, looking outside the bio_vec is pretty nasty.
>
> I think the problem here is that bio_integrity_add_page should
> just add to the existing bvec, similar to bio_add_page and friends.
Yep, that seems like a better approach. We should try to merge.
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
Powered by blists - more mailing lists