[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230413021931epcms2p3bfbfbcd26e2732138bd66e3d9943d45c@epcms2p3>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 11:19:31 +0900
From: Jinyoung CHOI <j-young.choi@...sung.com>
To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
CC: "hch@....de" <hch@....de>, "kbusch@...nel.org" <kbusch@...nel.org>,
"axboe@...com" <axboe@...com>,
"sagi@...mberg.me" <sagi@...mberg.me>,
"linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"chaitanyak@...dia.com" <chaitanyak@...dia.com>
Subject: RE:(2) (2) [PATCH 2/2] nvme-pci: fix metadata mapping length
> Jinyoung,
>
>> I think the problem is bio_integrity_add_page(). If it is modified,
>> sg functions for blk-integrity should also be modified.
>
> The bio integrity scatterlist handling predates NVMe and wasn't written
> with the single segment use case in mind. For SCSI we required the
> hardware to support an integrity segment per data segment.
>
> --
> Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
Hi Martin.
When merging is performed in bio_integrity_add_page(),
I think SG functions for integrity will be able to be modified more
concisely. It was just the reason. :)
If you are okay,
can I try to modify it to solve the problem with add_page?
Best Regards,
Jinyoung.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists