linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V3 8/9] arm64: dts: Add ipq5018 SoC and rdp432-c2 board support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <01b21803-9367-f253-3b66-b0a6c1d93cf2@linaro.org>
Date:   Fri, 14 Apr 2023 13:31:49 +0200
From:   Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
To:     Sricharan Ramabadhran <quic_srichara@...cinc.com>,
        agross@...nel.org, andersson@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, mturquette@...libre.com,
        sboyd@...nel.org, ulf.hansson@...aro.org, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
        catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org, p.zabel@...gutronix.de,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:     Varadarajan Narayanan <quic_varada@...cinc.com>,
        Gokul Sriram Palanisamy <quic_gokulsri@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 8/9] arm64: dts: Add ipq5018 SoC and rdp432-c2 board
 support



On 14.04.2023 12:29, Sricharan Ramabadhran wrote:
> Add initial device tree support for the Qualcomm IPQ5018 SoC and
> rdp432-c2 board.
> 
> Co-developed-by: Varadarajan Narayanan <quic_varada@...cinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Varadarajan Narayanan <quic_varada@...cinc.com>
> Co-developed-by: Gokul Sriram Palanisamy <quic_gokulsri@...cinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Gokul Sriram Palanisamy <quic_gokulsri@...cinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sricharan Ramabadhran <quic_srichara@...cinc.com>
> ---
>  [v3] Fixed all review comments and DTS schema warnings
This is too vague.

[...]

> +
> +			v2m1: v2m@...0 {
> +				compatible = "arm,gic-v2m-frame";
> +				reg = <0x00001000 0xffd>;
Doesn't this exceed the ranges=<> of &intc?

Konrad