[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1250225.1681480128@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date:   Fri, 14 Apr 2023 14:48:48 +0100
From:   David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:     Jia Zhu <zhujia.zj@...edance.com>
Cc:     dhowells@...hat.com, linux-cachefs@...hat.com,
        linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com, hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com,
        yinxin.x@...edance.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 4/5] cachefiles: narrow the scope of triggering EPOLLIN events in ondemand mode
Jia Zhu <zhujia.zj@...edance.com> wrote:
>  	if (cachefiles_in_ondemand_mode(cache)) {
> -		if (!xa_empty(&cache->reqs))
> -			mask |= EPOLLIN;
> +		if (!xa_empty(xa)) {
> +			rcu_read_lock();
> +			xa_for_each_marked(xa, index, req, CACHEFILES_REQ_NEW) {
> +				if (!cachefiles_ondemand_is_reopening_read(req)) {
> +					mask |= EPOLLIN;
> +					break;
> +				}
> +			}
> +			rcu_read_unlock();
You should probably use xas_for_each_marked() instead of xa_for_each_marked()
as the former should perform better.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
