[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1250225.1681480128@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 14:48:48 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Jia Zhu <zhujia.zj@...edance.com>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, linux-cachefs@...hat.com,
linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com, hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com,
yinxin.x@...edance.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 4/5] cachefiles: narrow the scope of triggering EPOLLIN events in ondemand mode
Jia Zhu <zhujia.zj@...edance.com> wrote:
> if (cachefiles_in_ondemand_mode(cache)) {
> - if (!xa_empty(&cache->reqs))
> - mask |= EPOLLIN;
> + if (!xa_empty(xa)) {
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + xa_for_each_marked(xa, index, req, CACHEFILES_REQ_NEW) {
> + if (!cachefiles_ondemand_is_reopening_read(req)) {
> + mask |= EPOLLIN;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> + rcu_read_unlock();
You should probably use xas_for_each_marked() instead of xa_for_each_marked()
as the former should perform better.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists