linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5] checkpatch: introduce proper bindings license check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 14 Apr 2023 18:06:55 +0300
From:   Dmitry Rokosov <ddrokosov@...rdevices.ru>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:     <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>, <apw@...onical.com>,
        <dwaipayanray1@...il.com>, <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>,
        <kernel@...rdevices.ru>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <rockosov@...il.com>, <robh@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] checkpatch: introduce proper bindings license check

On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 08:02:53AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Fri, 2023-04-14 at 14:39 +0300, Dmitry Rokosov wrote:
> > Hello Joe,
> > 
> > On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 09:29:36AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 2:17 PM Dmitry Rokosov <ddrokosov@...rdevices.ru> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > All headers from 'include/dt-bindings/' must be verified by checkpatch
> > > > together with Documentation bindings, because all of them are part of
> > > > the whole DT bindings system.
> > > > 
> > > > The requirement is dual licensed and matching patterns:
> > > > * Schemas:
> > > >     /GPL-2\.0(?:-only)? OR BSD-2-Clause/
> > > > * Headers:
> > > >     /GPL-2\.0(?:-only)? OR \S+/
> > > > 
> > > > Above patterns suggested by Rob at:
> > > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAL_Jsq+-YJsBO+LuPJ=ZQ=eb-monrwzuCppvReH+af7hYZzNaQ@mail.gmail.com
> > > > 
> > > > The issue was found during patch review:
> > > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230313201259.19998-4-ddrokosov@sberdevices.ru/
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Rokosov <ddrokosov@...rdevices.ru>
> > > > ---
> > > > Changes v5 since v4 at [4]:
> > > >     - only capital OR is acceptable for SPDX per Rob's suggestion
> []
> > > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> > 
> > Are you okay with this patch version? Rob is good with that, so please
> > advise what the next step is.
> 
> Yes, I'm fine with it.  Andrew Morton can apply it at his leisure.
> 

Sure, I look forward to receiving Andrew's comments in due course.

Thanks a lot for quick feedback!

-- 
Thank you,
Dmitry