linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5] checkpatch: introduce proper bindings license check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 14 Apr 2023 08:02:53 -0700
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     Dmitry Rokosov <ddrokosov@...rdevices.ru>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org, apw@...onical.com,
        dwaipayanray1@...il.com, lukas.bulwahn@...il.com,
        kernel@...rdevices.ru, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        rockosov@...il.com, robh@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] checkpatch: introduce proper bindings license check

On Fri, 2023-04-14 at 14:39 +0300, Dmitry Rokosov wrote:
> Hello Joe,
> 
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 09:29:36AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 2:17 PM Dmitry Rokosov <ddrokosov@...rdevices.ru> wrote:
> > > 
> > > All headers from 'include/dt-bindings/' must be verified by checkpatch
> > > together with Documentation bindings, because all of them are part of
> > > the whole DT bindings system.
> > > 
> > > The requirement is dual licensed and matching patterns:
> > > * Schemas:
> > >     /GPL-2\.0(?:-only)? OR BSD-2-Clause/
> > > * Headers:
> > >     /GPL-2\.0(?:-only)? OR \S+/
> > > 
> > > Above patterns suggested by Rob at:
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAL_Jsq+-YJsBO+LuPJ=ZQ=eb-monrwzuCppvReH+af7hYZzNaQ@mail.gmail.com
> > > 
> > > The issue was found during patch review:
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230313201259.19998-4-ddrokosov@sberdevices.ru/
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Rokosov <ddrokosov@...rdevices.ru>
> > > ---
> > > Changes v5 since v4 at [4]:
> > >     - only capital OR is acceptable for SPDX per Rob's suggestion
[]
> > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> 
> Are you okay with this patch version? Rob is good with that, so please
> advise what the next step is.

Yes, I'm fine with it.  Andrew Morton can apply it at his leisure.